<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - Other: how to change code to have quickbooks (which is looking to launch Microsoft Word, have it recognize libreoffice AS MS Word)???"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73451#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - Other: how to change code to have quickbooks (which is looking to launch Microsoft Word, have it recognize libreoffice AS MS Word)???"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73451">bug 73451</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:baron@caesar.elte.hu" title="Aron Budea <baron@caesar.elte.hu>"> <span class="fn">Aron Budea</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I replied to Thomas on IRC last night. QuickBooks is proprietary software, and
them supporting or not supporting LO is a business decision (as opposed to it
clearly being a bug). Thus if they decide against it, users don't have an
option, while LO is free and open source, and can (theoretically) be enhanced
to react to apps that are trying to call MS Office.
There are plenty of applications out there that are only prepared to interact
with an installed MSO for basic office functionality, and won't ever support
LO, therefore enhancements like this would have real benefit to users.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>