<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - SVG icons have visual glitches after upgrading to 6.3.0"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126771#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - SVG icons have visual glitches after upgrading to 6.3.0"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126771">bug 126771</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:stripe4@gmail.com" title="stripe4@gmail.com">stripe4@gmail.com</a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126771#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> "OpenGL enabled: Yes"
>
> Disable it and flush the icon cache... does it help?</span >
Hey, that was it! Thank you!
Actually, svg icons rendered without OpenGL enabled look really nice. I never
liked how they were rendered using OpenGL in 6.2.x, but they were still a bit
nicer than upscaled non-svg icons. You can see that for yourself in attached
screenshots. I also attached corresponding screenshots with options I had
enabled while I took those icon screenshots. "Options, OpenGL enabled" is what
I had enabled up until now.
I have a question though - should OpenGL be enabled by default on Windows if
rendered svg icon quality is so much better without it?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>