<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> changed <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - FOOTNOTES: Allow to place footnotes at the bottom of the text" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90921">bug 90921</a> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <th>What</th> <th>Removed</th> <th>Added</th> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td> <td>REOPENED </td> <td>UNCONFIRMED </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">CC</td> <td> </td> <td>heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org, libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">Keywords</td> <td> </td> <td>needsUXEval </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">Ever confirmed</td> <td>1 </td> <td> </td> </tr></table> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - FOOTNOTES: Allow to place footnotes at the bottom of the text" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90921#c24">Comment # 24</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - FOOTNOTES: Allow to place footnotes at the bottom of the text" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90921">bug 90921</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre> In reply to adaw2 from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=90921#c22">comment #22</a>) > The latest alleged solution is still a failure: > (1) The attachment did not resolve the problem. Note the gap between text > and footnotes on the first page, compared to the lack of gap between text > and footnotes on the second page. That is exactly the correct formatting--the reflink for each footnote _must_ appear on the page where the footnote is added to the bottom of the page. The blank space _will_ expand or contract page to page depending on the size of the footnote for the reflink appearing on the page! Subsequent Paragraph content holding reflink(s) is free to move to the following page to allow the preceding footnote to grow. (The problem only appears to be *somewhat* > addressed, by coincidence, due to the position and spacing of the footnotes; > see #2.) No coincidence. > (2) The attachment was formatted differently; notice the blank line between > footnotes in my document which is not present in the alleged solution. Once > you correct the footnote formatting in the alleged solution, the problem is > exacerbated and the document looks like mine. > No, <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=155413" name="attach_155413" title="text (double spaced) and reflinked footnotes into a single section">attachment 155413</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=155413&action=edit" title="text (double spaced) and reflinked footnotes into a single section">[details]</a> was prepared is with 'Default' page and paragraph style formatting with just paragraph line spacing set to double, as that seemed to be the requested format. > Again, the section method is not a real solution--it only appears to be in > certain situations. It is not an appearance of solution--it is the only solution that is viable (i.e. does not require major refactoring) page layout. @adaw2 (not even the OP) has been unable to prepare legitimate, reproducible example(s) screenshot(s) showing what formatting they seek, and what exactly is perceived as lacking by using an appropriately formatted section to hold paragraph and reflink'd footnotes. My UX input remains as in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=90921#c6">comment 6</a> as this WFM, and should otherwise be a WF. => Unconfirmed and back for UX-advise.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>