<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Image handling and memory usage horrible" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129101#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Image handling and memory usage horrible" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129101">bug 129101</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:roland@logikalsolutions.com" title="roland@logikalsolutions.com">roland@logikalsolutions.com</a> <pre>(In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=129101#c3">comment #3</a>) > (In reply to roland from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=129101#c2">comment #2</a>) > > (In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=129101#c1">comment #1</a>) > > > I don't know which version you used in Win 10 but about LO 6.0.7 on Ubuntu > > > is quite old. > > > 6.0, 6.1 and 6.2 branches are EOL. > > > Last stable LO version is 6.3.3 > > > Could you give a try with it? > > > > > > About Ubuntu, you can find recent LO versions in PPA. > > > > Windows 10 version I downloaded directly from the LO site just a few months > > ago. I got whatever was listed as "stable". > ok but before submitting a bug, you should give a try to last non dev > version. > I know there are memory management pbs in LO but perhaps some have been > already fixed. I stick with LTS. I'm not about to trash a machine I'm using for a legitimate task just to satisfy curiosity. > > > > > Technically I'm on KDE Neon distro which does still use some Ubuntu repos. > > There would need to be a PPA to keep things updated if the "maintainer" > > isn't maintaining the version in the LTS repos. > In this case, it's not LO pb but distribution problem. > > I put back UNCONFIRMED since I don't have more questions and it needs to be > confirmed. > > Does your book contain images/graphs or only text? If only text, the pb may > be the spell or grammar checker. For the test, could you disable it? As the bug report clearly stated. <blockquote>I'm currently writing "The Minimum You Need to Know About the Phallus of AGILE" which is tipping the scales around 600 pages. There are many images.</blockquote> I went here. <a href="https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa">https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa</a> Did this: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:libreoffice/ppa sudo pkcon update rebooted Opened a scrap copy of the file with this. Version: 6.3.3.2 Build ID: 1:6.3.3-0ubuntu0.18.04.1~lo1 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.0; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded I went to around page 14 and manually typed roughly 1.5 new pages of text, forcing 2 new page breaks, then I deleted a pre-existing page break. While it no longer takes 10 minutes to re-shuffle, it's still hoping to one day get good. I would not call it fixed. This version introduced a rather annoying "feature" to an almost complete book. The main reason I didn't want to change this software. AGILE always introduces numerous new points of failure. Now, in exchange for a tiny speed increase, it looks like every image gets a margin inside the top of the frame which I cannot fix. See attachment.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>