<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - EDITING: setting cross-reference still active after closing"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81720#c17">Comment # 17</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - EDITING: setting cross-reference still active after closing"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81720">bug 81720</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:davidl@safetylit.org" title="David Lawrence <davidl@safetylit.org>"> <span class="fn">David Lawrence</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Juang Dse from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81720#c15">comment #15</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Adomas Venčkauskas from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81720#c14">comment #14</a>)
> > Could we bump the importance of this bug to something higher. Bug
> > <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Do not extend ReferenceMarks when editing on its border (start or end)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=123224">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123224</a> was marked as
> > high by Dieter Praas due to issues this creates for referencing software
> > including Mendeley and Zotero.
>
> I agree. This is a serious issue for all cross-referencing, so the priority
> should definitely go up.
>
> This not only slows you down (<a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81720#c2">comment 2</a>), but really turns anybody off who
> tries to switch from other software to LO.</span >
Although marked as a duplicate, the report in 123224 provides a detailed
description of the steps to reproduce this problem.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>