<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN Date field in Word 6.0 document have wrong formatting"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90658#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN Date field in Word 6.0 document have wrong formatting"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90658">bug 90658</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:karl@huftis.org" title="Karl Ove Hufthammer <karl@huftis.org>"> <span class="fn">Karl Ove Hufthammer</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre><span class="quote">> I do not have a copy of Word to test the original document, but
> if the title was also 28.1.1998 in Word -- then I would be inclined to say:
> NAB</span >
The *literal* title is ‘28.1.1998’. But the fact that the date formatting isn’t
applied to the merge field is what this bug is all about. The ‘merge field’ has
a date format option applied, which specifies that it should be formatted as
‘\@ "dd.MM.yyyy"’ (i.e., with a leading zero for the month part). But this
isn’t taken into account when LibreOffice imports the document.
In Word 6, in which the document was created, the title is is displayed as
‘28.01.1998’. And I just tested this in Word 2016, and it’s displayed as
‘28.01.1998’ there too.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>