<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - an empty input field is invisible, unless the cursor happens to land on it" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129760#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - an empty input field is invisible, unless the cursor happens to land on it" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129760">bug 129760</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sdc.blanco@youmail.dk" title="sdc.blanco@youmail.dk">sdc.blanco@youmail.dk</a> <pre>Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=156963" name="attach_156963" title="simple illustration of user field">attachment 156963</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=156963&action=edit" title="simple illustration of user field">[details]</a> simple illustration of user field (In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=129760#c8">comment #8</a>) > Minimum width even for empty fields? Might be wanted to have zero width when > empty. If this was a question for me... ...my only concern was to be able to see the field (e.g., with ctrl-f8) ...was not trying to propose enhancement or UX design. If "zero width" has printing implications, then "zero width" might be preferred. Simpled-minded illustration attached.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>