<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Calc 6.3: Asian Font is Wrongly Applied to Western Text" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126248#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Calc 6.3: Asian Font is Wrongly Applied to Western Text" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126248">bug 126248</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:suokunlong@126.com" title="Kevin Suo <suokunlong@126.com>"> Kevin Suo</a> <pre>(In reply to Luboš Luňák from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126248#c8">comment #8</a>) It is the following function which caused this bug: SvtScriptType ScDocument::GetCellScriptType Specifically, it is related to OUString aStr. The bug is gone if I use back the following code: OUString aStr = ScCellFormat::GetString(*this, rPos, nNumberFormat, &pColor, *mxPoolHelper->GetFormTable()); and remove those lines added by that commit. I see the main difference between these two version is, previously the aStr is assigned a value: OUString aStr = ScCellFormat::GetString but in the new one, aStr is never assigned a value, but rather it is directly used in cCellFormat::GetString call, while the nRet still uses aStr as an arg. Is this correct? I am not familiar with c++ anyway. I added a std::cout and then print the value of aStr - With the bug code, aStr is always blank (none?) when I type in text in the cell. With the old code, aStr is correctly showing the text I type in.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>