<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Navigator mode can no longer be set from its attached Navigation toolbox dialog--OK with tear-away of the floating toolbox" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130004#c25">Comment # 25</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Navigator mode can no longer be set from its attached Navigation toolbox dialog--OK with tear-away of the floating toolbox" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130004">bug 130004</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=130004#c23">comment #23</a>) > Don't think we need UX input on this issue. The whole Navigator is > conceptually broken and needs a complete revamp. But here we face an > ordinary bug, or not. Yes what gets done for 6.4.0? Otherwise, we have Caolán's committed patches for the change to popdown, and Jim's still queued commit to change to listbbox that is held up with merge conflicts. Need UX decision, which UI going forward at master/7.0? Should Jim proceed with the 'Navigate by' list box on the Navigator deck? (In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=130004#c24">comment #24</a> > Actually many of those "other droplist/widget" also lost the tear-away > function recently, e.g. check with the font color or table border toolbar > buttons in recent master builds. Ouch, was that intentional? I see it now in recent masters, but not affecting 6.4.0.2 (yet?). So time to restore/rework the tearoff where still needed. Interesting recent master in that the Table 'Borders' dialog closes (like the Navigator toolbox was doing), but that the Table 'Border Style' dialog can still tearoff.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>