<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILESAVE wrong values for attribute chart:regression-type in ODF 1.2" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130133#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILESAVE wrong values for attribute chart:regression-type in ODF 1.2" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130133">bug 130133</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rb.henschel@t-online.de" title="Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>"> Regina Henschel</a> <pre>(In reply to Michael Stahl (CIB) from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=130133#c6">comment #6</a>) > > > @Michael: What do you think about the case "ODF 1.2 extended", which now > > still produces invalid files? > > given that we need to wait anyway, my question is: in a couple of years, who > wants to export ODF 1.2 extended, i'd expect the default to be ODF 1.3 > extended then, which already solves the problem... so given the timing i'm > not sure if it's worth the effort to start doing anything about 1.2 extended > now. I think, it's not worth the effort.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>