<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Consistent look and feel for color pickers in Sidebar" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130034#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Consistent look and feel for color pickers in Sidebar" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130034">bug 130034</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>I think I would prefer to remove the color name labeling across all the controls--and then have consistent tooltip with the 'color name' (RGB, HLC, tonal) as taken from the selected palette. I don't see too much need for the label. We show the color swatch for selected color, and can show the palette it came from. Likewise for gradient the swatch is visible, and can identify the palette it is being taken from. IIRC the gradients used to be fixed, but now we can mix and match palettes. What do we gain by shrinking the color swatch to add a textual label? Simplify the 'Gradient' fill UI to match the 'Color' fills--remove the labels! But do provide the assigned color name/RGB value in tooltip. That is replace the "Fill color", "Fill gradient from", "Fill gradient to" tooltips with the color name (or value). Obviously filter import of ODF document colors would only match color names against 'standard' palette, palette in use is not recorded into the ODF. And, this is just for labeling the color fills (Color, Gradient), the patterned fills (Hatching, Bitmap, Pattern) make sense to have the labels.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>