<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Support for &h &o Basic literals is incomplete"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130677#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Support for &h &o Basic literals is incomplete"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130677">bug 130677</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:LibreOfficiant@sfr.fr" title="LibreOļ¬ciant <LibreOfficiant@sfr.fr>"> <span class="fn">LibreOļ¬ciant</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>In the absence of a suffix &h &o notations should return Integer or Long
values. Basic seems to behave this way although Basic engine internals are
stored differently.
Whenever hexadecimal &h or octal &o literals can be rendered to Int16 numbers,
Typename() returns "Integer", Vartype() returns V_INTEGER
Whenever hexadecimal &h or octal &o literals are rendered to Int32 numbers,
Typename() returns "Double" instead of "Long", Vartype() returns V_INTEGER
instead of V_LONG
Basic-like languages do not necessarily 'explicitly' enforce 'default' Integer
or 'Long' number typing for & h &o notations. However I feel LibreOffice Basic
should support that.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>