<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Implement a PIM as a replacement for Outlook"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Implement a PIM as a replacement for Outlook"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496">bug 130496</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org" title="Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Randy from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=130496#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> LO does a great job of providing a replacement for
> everything else in the MS Office Suite, so why would they stop short with
> the Outlook part? </span >
Office applications:
Outlook
OneDrive
Word
Excel
PowerPoint
OneNote
SharePoint
Microsoft Teams
Office365 products:
Access (PC only)
Bookings
Exchange
MilelQ
MyAnalytics
Planner
PowerApps
Power BI
Project
Publisher (PC only)
Skype for Business Server
Stream
Sway
To Do
Visio
Whiteboard
Yammer
We clearly do not want to compete on all areas. And ultimately it's a business
decision what software you bundle. Microsoft sells products to customers with
the goal to dominate the market in all areas.
So I agree with out of scope.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>