<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ImpSvNumberInputScan::StringToDouble may produce inaccurate result" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130725#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ImpSvNumberInputScan::StringToDouble may produce inaccurate result" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130725">bug 130725</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Oliver Brinzing from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=130725#c14">comment #14</a>) > (In reply to Jonny Grant from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=130725#c13">comment #13</a>) > > Speaking frankly, I give up. Google Calc doesn't suffer this bug. > > Are you sure ? Jonny Grant mixes the two problems here in the crusade to achieve Casio precision. The real problem solved here in this specific bug is incorrect conversion between string containing a decimal number, and its closest IEEE 754 double precision representation. And this problem indeed is LibreOffice-specific. But Jonny Grant tries to expand the scope of the bug, which is a wrong thing to do; and then, indeed, the statement that GSheets or Excel or whatever do things differently is wrong.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>