<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Calc become very slow when using named ranges"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130949">130949</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>Calc become very slow when using named ranges
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>LibreOffice
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>6.3.5.2 release
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>x86-64 (AMD64)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Mac OS X (All)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>UNCONFIRMED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>medium
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>Calc
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>koledennix@gmail.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>Description:
When i set named range and use it into calculation, every interaction with that
sheet become very slow (scrolling, opening sheet)
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Make new spreadsheet
2.Put some number like 9,5 into cell a1
3.Set name for this cell like "some_named_cell"
4.Add sheet to that spreadsheet
5. Set some number like 100 into a1
6. Set formula =a1*some_named_cell into B1
7. Try to scroll page and open system monitor to view than libreoffice takes
100% cpu while interacting with
Actual Results:
Lags and slowdowns each time i open sheet with formula that includes named
range
Expected Results:
Smooth and fast working (scrolling, sheet switching)
Reproducible: Always
User Profile Reset: Yes
OpenGL enabled: Yes
Additional Info:
Версия: 6.4.0.3
ID сборки: b0a288ab3d2d4774cb44b62f04d5d28733ac6df8
Потоков ЦП: 4; ОС: Mac OS X 10.13.6; Отрисовка ИП: по умолчанию; VCL: osx;
Локаль: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); Язык интерфейса: ru-RU
Calc: threaded</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>