<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Table Cell Background Color from 6.2.8 Writer can't be changed in 6.3.4 and higher" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131040#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Table Cell Background Color from 6.2.8 Writer can't be changed in 6.3.4 and higher" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131040">bug 131040</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:momonasmon@gmail.com" title="Maxim Monastirsky <momonasmon@gmail.com>"> Maxim Monastirsky</a> <pre>(In reply to Ming Hua from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131040#c6">comment #6</a>) > and either offer two buttons on the toolbar And you call it a good UX to have two background buttons on the same toolbar? There will be much more confusion by people that won't understand the difference between the two, or accidentally click on the wrong one. > Or LO can alert the user when opening an > document with paragraph BG color instead of cell BG color. Paragraph color is a valid formatting by itself, and is not deprecated in any way. It makes no sense to "alert the user" about legitimate formatting. The software can't read user's mind, and has no way to determine if some formatting was done by mistake or by intention. > Or change the > default setting to have cell BG color overriding paragraph BG color, This won't be correct, as paragraph color and cell color are two different things. > and simply closing it as NOTABUG is very discouraging to our bug-reporting > users. User mistakes happen from time to time, and there's nothing "discouraging" in closing such bugs, given that a nice comment is added with explanation of the confusion and what caused it.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>