<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - ODF: LO writes invalid draw:name attribute for 3D-shapes"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131159#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - ODF: LO writes invalid draw:name attribute for 3D-shapes"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131159">bug 131159</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:rb.henschel@t-online.de" title="Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>"> <span class="fn">Regina Henschel</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Make a compromise? Perhaps:
Do not change anything for LO 6 and ODF 1.2 in LO 7. That way users who need
compatibility with older LO versions can save in ODF 1.2 format.
Change LO 7 so, that it does not write draw:name in case of strict ODF 1.3.
Announce it in release notes. Reasoning: Users which use the strict version of
file format likely want a guaranteed valid document with most chance of
interoperability. Other users will use the extended version, which is the
default version.
I'm not sure about LO 7 with ODF 1.3 extended. Switching to loext:name should
not be a so large additional effort and starting a new version number would be
the right time for such a change. On the other hand, in ODF 1.4 we will
(hopefully) have it in the standard anyway.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>