<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Data => Validity => Custom (like Excel) is missing" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96698#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Data => Validity => Custom (like Excel) is missing" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96698">bug 96698</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jag@psilosoph.de" title="Wolfgang Jäger <jag@psilosoph.de>"> Wolfgang Jäger</a> <pre>(In reply to Aron Budea from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=96698#c14">comment #14</a>) > Wolfgang, thanks for the comment, please open a new bug report with it, and > reference this one in the 'See also' field. Isn't this unnecessarily "bureaucratic"? I well noticed that my hints concerning the missing functionality didn't fit exatly under the subject. There are many bug reports, however, basically matching their subject even less. Surley user "burnuser" didn't just want a fake feature, but a working one, and insofar the bug (enhancement) isn't resolved. It would cost me another half hour probably to create an extra report, and there are already at least two more important ones I already deferred. (I'm not as fast as you, obviously.) (I may surrender anyway.)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>