<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Opening ODS file rise Incorrect Format exception. Opened well with OpenOffice 4.1.3"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116079#c18">Comment # 18</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Opening ODS file rise Incorrect Format exception. Opened well with OpenOffice 4.1.3"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116079">bug 116079</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:serval2412@yahoo.fr" title="Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>"> <span class="fn">Julien Nabet</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=116079#c16">comment #16</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Noel Grandin from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=116079#c13">comment #13</a>)
> > If Julien is correct in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=116079#c10">comment#10</a>, then that is technically not a
> > well-formed XML document.
>
> Just removing meta.xml from the document makes it open OK.
> And yes, having no elements in the XML after prolog (here consisting of
> declaration) makes the XML not well-formed [1].
>
> [1] <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-well-formed">https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-well-formed</a></span >
Indeed.
In this case, perhaps should we change the patch to replace the return part by
a SAL_WARN ?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>