<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:newbie-02@gmx.de" title="b. <newbie-02@gmx.de>"> <span class="fn">b.</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Crash if pasting/copying calc cells with comments (5000 lines)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377">bug 114377</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>newbie-02@gmx.de
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Crash if pasting/copying calc cells with comments (5000 lines)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Crash if pasting/copying calc cells with comments (5000 lines)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114377">bug 114377</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:newbie-02@gmx.de" title="b. <newbie-02@gmx.de>"> <span class="fn">b.</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>@Xavier: did you A) copy the commented cell from col A to col G? with col B to
F left empty, thus producing 10k of commented cells, or
did you B) copy the commented cells into the range! Ax:Gx? with also copies in
Bx to Fx? resulting in 35k of commented cells.
my best result for the copy to 5k rows with A): 14 seconds with LO ver 6.2.8.2
win, while B) with - only - 3,5 times the amount of comments took 2:12 minutes,
there is a 'non linear' effect from the amount of comments.
that while all linux versions showed much worse performance!
the good performance of ver 6.2 is fading out, 7.0.0.0.a0+ took 3:50 minutes
with var. B) to become ready to click on a new cell, and afterwards took
between 1 and 3:30 minutes to react (change the focus to that cell) after a
click on a cell ... unusable.
- good? performance ... no ... 'a little less bad', good would be if commented
cells could keep up with the processing speed of normal cells, it takes less
than a second to copy two cells, one with 'a' and one with 'test' in it, to 70k
cells (A1:N5000), thus we can say storing and handling of information in
comments is very inefficient at all -
6.2.8.2 - win!!! - stays 'responsive' also with 35k of commented cells, that's
why i'm using it.
reg.
b.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>