<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILEOPEN Rectangle in SVG has wrong selection rectangle" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131523#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILEOPEN Rectangle in SVG has wrong selection rectangle" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131523">bug 131523</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:baron@caesar.elte.hu" title="Aron Budea <baron@caesar.elte.hu>"> Aron Budea</a> <pre>Thanks for the detailed explanation, Regina! (In reply to Regina Henschel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131523#c3">comment #3</a>) > If you "open" an svg image, the document has exactly the size of the svg > image, which is width="28" and height="4" in this case. Clicking on the > image will always select the entire image and not a part of it. Only if you > "Break" an svg image, it will be converted into a collection of its child > elements. Then you can select the rectangle itself. If it was opened for embedding in a drawing, then I'd understand why the entire image is a single object, but it's opened for editing. And when the graphics is being edited, the actual object(s) should be separate from the canvas. Can't the "outer svg-element" you mentioned safely be equated to the canvas?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>