<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - formula 'large' behave different between Version 6.1.6.3 and Version 6.4.0.3" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132079#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - formula 'large' behave different between Version 6.1.6.3 and Version 6.4.0.3" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132079">bug 132079</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ernesto.bosch@gmail.com" title="Ernesto Bosch <ernesto.bosch@gmail.com>"> Ernesto Bosch</a> <pre> Hi m.a.riosv: Thanks for your answer, but (there is always a 'but') as you can see in the new attach file in Sheet1b with the old way and labels I was able to model large (very large) variable length sets of data just filling the blanks (yellow in the spreadsheet) without to redo the spread itself. Now, for every set I'll have to redo de formulae. Anyway, I'm thinking to move all the workload to python. I's a pity my boss (at the lab will not be able anymore to work by himself) Last comment: it feel to me that with new standard a big loss of flexibility has been achieved.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>