<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - formula 'large' behave different between Version 6.1.6.3 and Version 6.4.0.3" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132079#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - formula 'large' behave different between Version 6.1.6.3 and Version 6.4.0.3" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132079">bug 132079</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ernesto.bosch@gmail.com" title="Ernesto Bosch <ernesto.bosch@gmail.com>"> Ernesto Bosch</a> <pre> Sorry for my lack of understanding, but I don't understand why ODF 1.2 should made obsolete the all old way of working (I mean copy-and-paste). Maybe there was something wrong with the way to spreadsheet modelling using LARGE/SMALL functions that I ignore. Today it seems to me that ODF 1.2 it's "fixing what it was unbroken". If the is no bug I shall have to throw away years of work. I would really appreciate if someone can explain why LARGE is no fitted anymore for copy-and-paste and have to be used as a matrix formula only. Best regards (In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=132079#c5">comment #5</a>) > Where is the bug? Current behavior seams to be conforming the ODF 1.2 > standard. > <a href="https://help.libreoffice.org/6.4/en-US/text/scalc/01/04060183">https://help.libreoffice.org/6.4/en-US/text/scalc/01/04060183</a>. > html?DbPAR=CALC#bm_id3149530 > > So is the bug in 6.2.8 and newer or in older versions? > > Best regards. JBF</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>