<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILEOPEN: Background image in docx looses 'transparency' (brightness/contrast settings) (see comment #16)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85757#c22">Comment # 22</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILEOPEN: Background image in docx looses 'transparency' (brightness/contrast settings) (see comment #16)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85757">bug 85757</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> Justin L</a> <pre>Still not fixed in 7.0 master. OP's 2014 X-Country Schedule v 4.docx still opens with a very black watermark image. The image opens as a "drawing object" instead of an "image". When round-tripped, it is considered as a regular image as noted in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=85757#c17">comment 17</a>. <a href="https://askubuntu.com/questions/570789/fading-image-in-libre-office">https://askubuntu.com/questions/570789/fading-image-in-libre-office</a> indicates how you can set transparency on the image itself. Note that the properties tab for "transparency" is for the Area color and not the image itself. So the key would be to figure out why this background image is first inserted as a draw object, and then exported as a regular image. If it could be imported as a regular image, then for sure the transparency settings could be applied. Alternatively, it MIGHT be possible to set transparency on the drawing object, and just wasn't done?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>