<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Make higher zoom levels possible/available on iOS" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128507#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Make higher zoom levels possible/available on iOS" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128507">bug 128507</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tml@iki.fi" title="Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>"> Tor Lillqvist</a> <pre>Suggested fix in <a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/online/+/92259">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/online/+/92259</a> . I wonder, should we add some logic to use larger zoom steps further away from 100% ? Now each step is always pow(2,1/4) (1.1892), i.e. four steps are required to double or halve the zoom. That fits reasonably well into what one would expect between 35% and 200%, but to have four steps also from 200% to 400% (235%, 280%, 335%, 400%) is perhaps excessive. Also, the convention of rounding the zoom to the closest five percent should perhaps be changed above 200% to be the closest 10 or even 20 percent? Perhaps the amount of rounding should also be exponential? (We already use 150% as the label for what is actually 1.4142. I guess this is because 150% is a naïve user's expectation that "150% is half between 100% and 200%".)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>