<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - No means of dragging an image when its anchored as character" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87719#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - No means of dragging an image when its anchored as character" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87719">bug 87719</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:baron@caesar.elte.hu" title="Aron Budea <baron@caesar.elte.hu>"> Aron Budea</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=87719#c11">comment #11</a>) > We discussed the topic in the design meeting. The default anchoring is To > Character, by design, and those objects can be moved around. Not being able > to drag an object when placed _As_ character makes sense consequently. As > there is no other use case we better resolve the ticket as WF. I feel like it must be pointed out: character selections can be dragged around. Not being able to drag an object that is anchored as character does not make sense, and is an annoyance UX-wise. As a bit of history wrt <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Default insert image anchor, wrapping, and spacing (see comment #43 for summary at 2020-04-15)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=87720">bug 87720</a>, "as character" anchor being the default was introduced for interop reasons (primarily with Word), but later was abandoned due to this annoying bug. Documents containing images with "as character" anchor will continue existing, and this bug will continue being a bother regardless of what the default is. Please keep this bug report open.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>