<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - libreoffice-base not installed and mail merge wizard fail to install it automatically, all database functionalities not working" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131592#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - libreoffice-base not installed and mail merge wizard fail to install it automatically, all database functionalities not working" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131592">bug 131592</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:iplaw67@tuta.io" title="Alex Thurgood <iplaw67@tuta.io>"> Alex Thurgood</a> <pre>(In reply to Adolfo Jayme from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131592#c6">comment #6</a>) > > If Ubuntu (Canonical) want to correct the error message to highlight their > > failure > > Please save the FUD to yourself. No fear, uncertainty or doubt about it. This was clearly a decision taken by someone at some stage within Canonical when it came to including LO in the release. The fact that is has an effect on user's of Canonical's Ubuntu distribution and is an ongoing topic repeatedly reported on both the LO bugzilla and on LibreOffice Ask clearly shows that it has an impact on those users (I should know, I am one of them). It shows LibreOffice in a bad light, but it wasn't a LibreOffice project decision.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>