<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org" title="Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org>"> <span class="fn">Buovjaga</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - support for SQL datatype INTERVAL"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51779">bug 51779</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - support for SQL datatype INTERVAL"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51779#c12">Comment # 12</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - support for SQL datatype INTERVAL"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51779">bug 51779</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org" title="Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org>"> <span class="fn">Buovjaga</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Gökay ŞATIR from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=51779#c11">comment #11</a>)
<span class="quote">> Is there an ongoing discussion about which db system to choose? Like this
> one:
> <a href="https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/88866/base-firebird-vs-hsqldb">https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/88866/base-firebird-vs-hsqldb</a>-
> embedded-database/
>
> Or is the decision is made already?
>
> I think SQLite could again be the candidate. Its latest versions support
> multiple reads at the same time, it handles multiple connections well.
>
> SQLite just needs a wrapper for data types, which can be implemented on top
> of it.
>
> Also, it has amalgamation, i personally find that feature valuable.</span >
There is no ongoing discussion. The decision was made long ago. Since then,
there have been multiple Google Summer of Code projects and also TDF contracts
to bring embedded Firebird into a production-ready status.
I highly recommend you to contribute to the meta reports:
<a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=116970&hide_resolved=1">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=116970&hide_resolved=1</a>
<a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=116968&hide_resolved=1">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=116968&hide_resolved=1</a>
There are some fundamental data type differences between HSQLDB and Firebird,
but the upcoming Firebird 4.0 will solve a couple of these and hopefully a
future version will solve more. This would make it easier to migrate existing
database files from HSQLDB to Firebird.
<a href="https://firebirdsql.org/file/community/conference-2019/1_firebird_on_the_road_from4_to_5.pdf">https://firebirdsql.org/file/community/conference-2019/1_firebird_on_the_road_from4_to_5.pdf</a>
Hopefully we will see 4.0 during the second quarter of 2020.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>