<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - FILEOPEN (BASE) Connection to Oracle DB via ODBC ends in [ODBC][ORACLE] Optional Feature not implemented" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779#c13">Comment # 13</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - FILEOPEN (BASE) Connection to Oracle DB via ODBC ends in [ODBC][ORACLE] Optional Feature not implemented" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779">bug 122779</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:serval2412@yahoo.fr" title="Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>"> Julien Nabet</a> <pre>(In reply to Johan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=122779#c12">comment #12</a>) > (In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=122779#c11">comment #11</a>) > > What about using a 64 bit driver with LO 64 bits? > > If there's no 64 bits driver, only 32 bits, it's expected to require LO 32 > > bits. > > By default we're using the 64 bit ODBC driver with LO 64 bit. Does this config work? > When I remove > the 64 bit ODBC driver, install only the 32 bit ODBC driver and create a DSN > in the 32 bit windows configuration interface, LO Base responds with: > > "The specified DSN contains an architecture mismatch between the Driver and > Application" If you use LO 64 bits with 32 bit ODBC driver + DSN in the 32 bit Windows conf, I think it can be expected. What about if in this 32 bit case, you uninstall LO 64 bits and install LO 32 bits?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>