<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Arithmetic error in Writer" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131151#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Arithmetic error in Writer" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131151">bug 131151</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:albrecht.mueller@astrail.de" title="Albrecht Müller <albrecht.mueller@astrail.de>"> Albrecht Müller</a> <pre>The bug is also not in Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64) Build-ID: 9b0d9b32d5dcda91d2f1a96dc04c645c450872bf CPU-Threads: 4; BS: Windows 6.1; UI-Render: Standard; Gebietsschema: de-DE (de_DE); Calc: group This seems to support Oliver Brinzings assumption that this bug is related to <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Regression: Incompatible changes in date/time arithmetic introduced between Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64) and version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=127334">bug 127334</a>. It is interesting in the context of the wall clock vs. duration format discussion. The error appears in column D. In this column you correctly use wall clock format HH:MM for a wall clock time. Note that the value in line 8 column D should be exactly the same a the one in line 7 column E as it is just a copy of this value and the same format is used. Nevertheless the displayed values differ (16:49 vs. 16:50). I fear that this problem is related to a correct implementation of the specification of date and time arithmetic which makes it susceptible to tiny round off errors.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>