<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Copy file path to past buffer when saving a document" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127869#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Copy file path to past buffer when saving a document" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127869">bug 127869</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:hinckleybob@gmail.com" title="HinckleyBob <hinckleybob@gmail.com>"> HinckleyBob</a> <pre>What is WF? I believe adding this feature would enhance usability for some of us. If usability is the criteria for arguing that "Adding more and more won't improve the situation," it seems counter-intuitive to not consider any suggestion for improving usability. Is there a problem with adding more and more usability? Adding unlimited usability does indeed add complexity, and after that becomes an issue it needs to be resolved differently. In that case, removing features or redesign become alternatives to be considered.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>