<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Assertion failure when checking font preview for certain fonts in LOOL"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132445#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Assertion failure when checking font preview for certain fonts in LOOL"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132445">bug 132445</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:baron@caesar.elte.hu" title="Aron Budea <baron@caesar.elte.hu>"> <span class="fn">Aron Budea</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=132445#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> I think the "fix" for <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - Assertion failure when opening a document in LOOL (w certain fonts installed)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=132424">bug 132424</a> may simply paper over the real problem. If
> the same happens for loading documents without that fix, that somehow means
> font handling isn't working correctly at this point. Guess someone needs to
> look into the original weld patch and see what is different now.</span >
Right, what Caolán wrote there is that the assert is actually unrelated to the
weld patch, it just became triggered at a different time. I could verify that
right before the weld patch it could be triggered with the same repro steps as
in the description above, thus the patch identified in <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - Assertion failure when opening a document in LOOL (w certain fonts installed)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=132424">bug 132424</a> is irrelevant
when it comes to the assert.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>