<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - New macOS icon theme lacks polish and integration"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133061#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - New macOS icon theme lacks polish and integration"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133061">bug 133061</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:iplaw67@tuta.io" title="Alex Thurgood <iplaw67@tuta.io>"> <span class="fn">Alex Thurgood</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>
<span class="quote">>
> I don't think this has to do with the creative freedom of individuals,
> because you are talking about the entire visual identity of your software.
> If you want people, businesses, and governments to take it seriously as an
> MS Office alternative, you need to yourself to take design seriously. I
> believe that in this case stability should win out - unless there is
> evidence of a pressing need to change the default, the default should not be
> changes.</span >
I can agree with you on that - some FOSS projects feel the need to rebrand /
reinvent themselves on a regular basis, LibreOffice is not an exception in that
regard.
Quite why that urgent "need" is felt and acted on, I have never really
understood.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>