<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - FILEOPEN XLSX: Calc doesn't handle SUMIFS() with array as the third parameter correctly"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133260#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - FILEOPEN XLSX: Calc doesn't handle SUMIFS() with array as the third parameter correctly"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133260">bug 133260</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:erack@redhat.com" title="Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Eike Rathke</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Yes. It looks like an inline array (unlike a cell range reference) as argument
where a scalar value is expected would force array mode of the entire formula
expression. Question remains what happens if it is not an inline array but an
array/matrix returned from a function that itself is not in a forced array
context. The results of these examples could be interesting:
=SUM(ABS(MUNIT(2)))
=SUM(ABS(MUNIT(2)*-1))
If both behave the same as with the inline array the result should be 2 for
both, otherwise 1 (for one or both expressions).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>