<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Character styles break Find and replace using attributes Font+size" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133439#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Character styles break Find and replace using attributes Font+size" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133439">bug 133439</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>Sigh. (In reply to Luke Kendall from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=133439#c7">comment #7</a>) > "Your POV [...] is incorrect" This is so ... you chose to cite incompletely, thus constructing something from parts of my phrases that you choose to make me look saying I didn't say. Luckily, my words are there, and anyone may see that I actually wrote: "Your PoV is not incompatible with mine". Again: there I said that our points of view are in fact compatible; and you citing that way just attempted to look it both the other way round, and rude. Nice of you. > ; "You are wrong"). And reading *my* words, not your interesting quotations, one may see that I said that only some aspect is incorrect: saying that my approach is reject that large class of users who don't use styles. Citing it in full, just for the record: > Your PoV is not incompatible with mine; but your idea that just thinking > that "not using styles is OK makes anything useful" (I will explain below) > is incorrect. > > You say something like "you (Mike Kaganski) tell that Writer is for using > styles; but there are people who don't use styles, and your approach reject > that large class of users". You are wrong. Again: you are wrong when you tell that I suggest an approach that rejects people who do not use styles. Then - you fail to see that I try to address your bug, not close it. I propose to think about alternative ways to solve it. But you are behaving like "I have so huge competence and experience!!!" (as if you know my background not having something comparable). "If you do not agree that *my* proposal how to fix it is the only one possible, then you are unable to see other's PoV" ... heh, just try to read how backward is that. Nevertheless, no matter if OP wants to participate here or not, the issue deserves UX team attention.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>