<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: User defined number format not applied to fields inside header or footer"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133459#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: User defined number format not applied to fields inside header or footer"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133459">bug 133459</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jag@psilosoph.de" title="Wolfgang Jäger <jag@psilosoph.de>"> <span class="fn">Wolfgang Jäger</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Regina Henschel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=133459#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> Created <span class=""><a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161573" name="attach_161573" title="number style in <office:styles>">attachment 161573</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161573&action=edit" title="number style in <office:styles>">[details]</a></span>
> number style in <office:styles>
>
> I don't think, that the mentioned commit is the whole problem. But it might
> have uncovered the underlying cause.
>
> If the <number:date-style> is in <office:styles> and not in
> <office:automatic-styles>, then the field in the header does not find the
> style. That problem is inherit from OOo.
>
> But because it is a user-defined date style, I think, that <office:styles>
> is the correct place for it.</span >
Based on just a faint hope to understand better:
In what way should the bug's "underlying cause" have been covered by versions
where it was present in but did not become manifest?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>