<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Enhancement: Support for real-time, synchronous collaborative editing in LibreOffice (desktop)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133984#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Enhancement: Support for real-time, synchronous collaborative editing in LibreOffice (desktop)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133984">bug 133984</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:baron@caesar.elte.hu" title="Aron Budea <baron@caesar.elte.hu>"> <span class="fn">Aron Budea</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Gerry from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=133984#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> I do not agree with you simply referring to LO Online for collaborative work
> and disregarding LibreOffice desktop.
> (1) In a professional setting (e.g. working on complex documents in a team),
> users need a full-fledged/featured office suite *and* need to
> collaboratively work on such documents. The competition (MS Word, to a
> lesser extent Excel, Powerpoint) can do that and and this is an essential
> and very important feature for working groups.</span >
If there are features missing from LibreOffice Online that'd be important for
certain kinds of professional work, wouldn't it make more sense to add those
instead?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>