<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Mysql timestamp fields not displayed in table data entry mode with mysql jdbc-connector ConnectorJ 8.x" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119139#c31">Comment # 31</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Mysql timestamp fields not displayed in table data entry mode with mysql jdbc-connector ConnectorJ 8.x" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119139">bug 119139</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:serval2412@yahoo.fr" title="Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>"> Julien Nabet</a> <pre>(In reply to Alex Thurgood from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=119139#c30">comment #30</a>) > > why not just keeping jdbc and dump mysql_jdbc to simplify? >... > Whilst I agree pretty much with your suggestions, I don't really understand > how that will solve the timestamp issue ? You're right, it doesn't help indeed and certainly it wasn't the right place to talk about this but I thought we should begin to take into account the fork between both databases, perhaps bugs may be more difficult with the time to reproduce if we don't have the same DBs. (for example, on my personal desktop, I got Linux with a MariaDB Server + use MariaDB jar)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>