<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Start Center: No-thumbnail view now uses small icons for non-encrypted documents" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134065#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Start Center: No-thumbnail view now uses small icons for non-encrypted documents" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134065">bug 134065</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134065#c1">comment #1</a>) > Guess the large icon was chosen because no content can be shown due to > encryption. The mentioned patch just changed the icon size for the > (non-encrypted) overlay. No. It changed not "the icon size for the (non-encrypted) overlay", but icon size returned from getDefaultThumbnail. And the latter is used not only to get the overlay, but also in RecentDocsViewItem::RecentDocsViewItem, for cases when an item does not have a thumbnail: that includes combinations of "no thumbnail in registrymodifications.xcu"; "file is not from file: protocol"; "RecentDocsThumbnail is false"; "file URL is unaccessible". And the screenshot clearly displays that "just changed the icon size for the (non-encrypted) overlay" is not correct ;-)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>