<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Number of pages in a document changed from 954 to 979 since LibO 5.3" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134051#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Number of pages in a document changed from 954 to 979 since LibO 5.3" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134051">bug 134051</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>(In reply to Xisco Faulí from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134051#c8">comment #8</a>) > As long as there's no data loss, the number of pages is irrelevant. Spacing > issues make the documents have less or more pages. Depending on the space > available, images will be placed on one page or the next one. Nothing wrong > with that. (A) The doc in question has no images.. so that can be ruled out. (B) Nice, but what about RTF paste & DOC export.. what makes that it fitting on exact 954 pages.. It would be consistent.. expect of data got lost.. And it would matter to 2/3 pages.. not the 25 pages.. quite a lot! > By the way, don't be so irresponsible to write a 900+ pages document. Use > master documents for that (A) Tell that the author the specific document <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161979" name="attach_161979" title="ODT file for Export">attachment 161979</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161979&action=edit" title="ODT file for Export">[details]</a> (B) Quite some documents with 450 - 750 pages around.. Or its the advice to use hard page break on every page.. to prevent some page flow issue.. The footnotes in the bug doc are the likely the cause.. and let there be an overall issue with footnotes + layout.. And this still is a regression; as it has been working before, not by an incident.. it worked until 5.3 came along.. and someone broke it. This can happen on every file opening.. and this is not the first report about something fishy with the page numbering.. But there is always an argument.. different font rendering, different layout because of anchoring.. to many pages.. cross page tables.. In this case someone obviously broke something.. and is not a minor shift in pages. Nearly everything is ruled out in this bug, except for many pages and footnotes</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>