<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Adding fonts for special features" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134212#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Adding fonts for special features" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134212">bug 134212</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:dante19031999@gmail.com" title="dante19031999@gmail.com">dante19031999@gmail.com</a> <pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134212#c5">comment #5</a>) > No, users with an interest in expanded node logic for additional sm Elements > catalog will already have appropriate fonts "on system". > > Implementers of such additional nodes would be responsible for adding to the > default OpenSymbol (opens___.ttf), or to its replacement font should one be > selected. > > DejaVu or STIX 2 have been my thought. I don't really mind whose fonts are. I just need a double stroke one and a script one usable for mathematics. After that the user is free to use whatever he wants. For example I use Fine Blackboard as double stroke font, but it costs 50,000€ for large agencies. DejaVu is verry common on linux systems. The STIX 2 are nice, but do not cover this. If it's OK I can upload them to gerrit. I'm fragmentating the math improvements into small parts because they said me it would be better to only solve one bug / enancement per patch. But takes a lot of time.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>