<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:lo_bugs@iseries-guru.com" title="Terrence Enger <lo_bugs@iseries-guru.com>"> <span class="fn">Terrence Enger</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Crash in: SfxShell::SetDisableFlags(SfxDisableFlags)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113273">bug 113273</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>lo_bugs@iseries-guru.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Crash in: SfxShell::SetDisableFlags(SfxDisableFlags)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113273#c16">Comment # 16</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Crash in: SfxShell::SetDisableFlags(SfxDisableFlags)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113273">bug 113273</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:lo_bugs@iseries-guru.com" title="Terrence Enger <lo_bugs@iseries-guru.com>"> <span class="fn">Terrence Enger</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162368" name="attach_162368" title="bibisect in lo-linux-dbgutil-daily-till52">attachment 162368</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162368&action=edit" title="bibisect in lo-linux-dbgutil-daily-till52">[details]</a></span>
bibisect in lo-linux-dbgutil-daily-till52
Working in bibisect repository lo-linux-dbgutil-daily-till52$ on
debian-buster, I see that the bug entered LO somewhere in the 65 or so
commits:
commit s-h date
-------- -------- -------------------
good 09325a16 4ab31493 2016-05-24 00:40:36
bad 6f9d5d29 44326f8d 2015-05-24 21:19:42
Observations and questions arising:
(*) I used a separate UserInstallation directory, which I named on the
command line.
(*) I followed the steps in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=113273#c8">comment 8</a> once; then for each probe I
followed the steps in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=113273#c12">comment 12</a>.
(*) The crashes I observed were "Signal 6". In a recent local-built
soffice.bin, comparing my backtrace to Julien Nabet's attachment,
I see at the top 14 additional frames of signal handling; after
that there are 36 frames of same-named functions.
(*) If I open the .odt by clicking the thumbnail in Start Center, LO
prompts "update or keep old style" (and possibly crashes upon
closing) only the second time I open the file.
(*) The "update or keep old style" message cites template
'modèle_test1', but the file I downloaded and from which I created
the .odt is 'modele_test1.ott'.
I wonder if this is central to the bug?
I am removing keyword bibisectRequest and adding bibisected.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>