<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Writer loses last user event if auto-save triggers nearly at the same time" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106208#c16">Comment # 16</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Writer loses last user event if auto-save triggers nearly at the same time" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106208">bug 106208</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>A assume this is know: <a href="https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/framework/source/services/autorecovery.cxx?r=a2fc8831#2227">https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/framework/source/services/autorecovery.cxx?r=a2fc8831#2227</a> Strange part, they 300 delay is defined for autorecovery save. The same logic isn't applied for autosave, I think. Not that I pretend to be able to actually read the code ;-).. So maybe LibreOffice should check 'if there is still key-input'. And only starting the autosave if there is some small idle gap. So not withing a sentence.. However everybody is typing at different speeds.. so still room for failure Ideally <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Allow typing while saving; during autosave LibreOffice doesn't accept typing/input" href="show_bug.cgi?id=48416">bug 48416</a> gets solved.. but this could maybe/ideally be optimized/ tweaked a little without lots of effort (so wouldn't call this a dupe of bug 48416 straight forward). Of course if this still a problem.. but that's up to Luke</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>