<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - CRASH: importing file with Enable very large spreadsheets enabled"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134392#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - CRASH: importing file with Enable very large spreadsheets enabled"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134392">bug 134392</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>For the record.. Support for very large spreadsheets is largely advertised in
the release notes.. Even in Experimental state they multi_type_vector::position
bug should go away before release.. you can't touch nearly anything or it
crashes.. see the others
Gives a bad impression.. some people are eager to try and end up in a
disillusion.. managing expectation.. you can better advertise something as
experimental although it actually should be rock solid already. Instead of
creating hopes which aren't met.. it's a disappointing experience for probably
everybody..
I know that people are in awaiting of Support for very large spreadsheets
eagerly and that there is some pressure to deliver etc
However this now moves to the area where a developer has to look at it, and it
can't be handled as a side project.. Ok, it still can.. but should be somewhat
useable</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>