<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: Branding: LibreOffice Personal edition" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134486#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: Branding: LibreOffice Personal edition" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134486">bug 134486</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:testing1237a-c@yahoo.com" title="johnks <testing1237a-c@yahoo.com>"> johnks</a> <pre>my two cents. "This software is developed by a team of volunteers and us supported by the community." an "edition" means there are versions of the software when there are not. The download provided by <a href="https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/">https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/</a> is the de facto install and the "enterprise supported" "versions" like by collabora are small privately distributed and supported having their own user base. Why should the 99% of people who recognize the LibreOffice be now faced with a "community" version when infact this is the only version they can get. IMO, if a corporate entity wants to use the above version, my message would tell them that they can't expect support from TDF but from the community. If they want to pay for "support" then people like collabora would help there but for 99% of people, this message should be enough</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>