<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - FILEOPEN XLSX borders are not compatible" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134143#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - FILEOPEN XLSX borders are not compatible" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134143">bug 134143</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:leiyang@kylinos.cn" title="NSO LibreOffice Team <leiyang@kylinos.cn>"> NSO LibreOffice Team</a> <pre>(In reply to Regina Henschel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134143#c8">comment #8</a>) > I think, that is mainly a problem of Excel not of LibreOffice. The dotted > line is the way Excel renders a hairline. Excel has only a fixed set of line > styles. These line styles include already the thickness, there exist no > separate setting for thickness. > LibreOffice uses a mapping between LO styles and Excel styles, see > <a href="https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/filter/excel/xestyle">https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/filter/excel/xestyle</a>. > cxx?r=b7ed6de5#1608 > In this case the line is 0.06pt and therefore falls into case hairline. > Details about mapping are in > <a href="https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/qa/unit/data/README">https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/qa/unit/data/README</a>. > cellborders?r=6777720c > > Nevertheless one might consider to change the mapping to base it mainly on > style and not on thickness. Hi, Regina Henschel I agree with you , Please help me change the status of this bug</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>