<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - IMPRESS: two Align submenus under Format menu (one for text, other for objects/shapes)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134739#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - IMPRESS: two Align submenus under Format menu (one for text, other for objects/shapes)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134739">bug 134739</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:notebook22312@gmail.com" title="DarkTrick <notebook22312@gmail.com>"> DarkTrick</a> <pre>Short: Perhaps I'd support moving the menu item. Broaden the subject =================== I would argue, that the content of the "Format" menu does not make sense in some cases. For me personally "Format" is something intrinsic and persistent. So it's strange, that "aligning objects" is under "Format" in the first place. In contrast: "Arranging" object (z-axis) is more temporary; "Convert"ing an object is a one-time action. (... and I'm not even sure what "Rotate" is intended for...) Back to the main topic ====================== Compare the menu structure to the tabbed user-interface: - Text alignment is under "Home" - Object alignment is under "Layout" At first glance this makes perfect sense My thoughts ============ Maybe "Align", "Arrange" and "Group" might be better off in Edit? Maybe with a(n unselectable) header row on top? Maybe even a dedicated Menu item "Object" might make sense. Semantically Object->Group, Object->align, Object->arrange, Object->convert make pretty good sense to me. (Maybe there's a better term than "Object") About the idea of renaming ========================== Most simple solution. But it would try to work around the fact, that the menu items should not be under "Format". (IMO)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>