<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Redundancy in Table of Contents and Indexes" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134781#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Redundancy in Table of Contents and Indexes" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134781">bug 134781</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:page74010-sf@yahoo.fr" title="ajlittoz <page74010-sf@yahoo.fr>"> ajlittoz</a> <pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134781#c9">comment #9</a>) > An own mode, dedicated to list the number range elements seems > a good option, at the same time simplifying the UI for the two modes in > question. > > A question whether some/all modes should provide an option to make > alphabetical lists with grouping is a separate IMO, and should not be > considered along with this one in the same issue. > > Also a question about having hyperlinks for table lists by default is a > separate, with no clear reason not to have them. Excellent conclusion, three separate issues. The second one may wait because it does not exist today and nobody will feel frustrated as they did without till now. The third one is a mystery but the workaround if to use "Table of Figures" for hyperlinks and "Index of Tables" if they are not needed. Anyway, you can also modify the Structure line (removing LS/LE in "Table …" or adding them in "Index …" because the button is present.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>