<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Redundancy in Table of Contents and Indexes"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134781#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Redundancy in Table of Contents and Indexes"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134781">bug 134781</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Mike Kaganski</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134781#c9">comment #9</a>)
<span class="quote">> In the second mode ("Object names"), the tool actually looks for objects of
> related category in the document. This mode justifies the distinction
> between these two entries in the list.</span >
And maybe I'd even removed these two entries completely, and moved their second
"Object names" modes into existing "Index of Objects", to the list that has all
these "LibreOffice Math/Clac/..." and other OLE things. That they are OLE
things is just an implementation detail; from user PoV, a Math Formula in the
text document is something of the same level as a table or an image.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>