<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin L</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN DOCX: Image Location lost on Import"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128877">bug 128877</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>libreoffice@nisz.hu
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN DOCX: Image Location lost on Import"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128877#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN DOCX: Image Location lost on Import"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128877">bug 128877</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin L</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>IMHO, these kinds of patches should be reverted as soon as it is clear that the
author is not going to responds (in two or three weeks). Loosing image
positioning is a pretty bad regression.
Perhaps the NISZ guys are willing to investigate this. It is probably a
somewhat easy fix for a shapes person to fix, and they have been doing a lot of
work in this area.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>